Skip to main content

Blog: Social networking sites

http://touraynewmedia.blogspot.com/2018/06/blog-social-networking-sites.html     In this post, I'll discuss my impressions of Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and LinkedIn. All social media sites, they're all niched in their offerings and user base but also rooted in the same functionality with respect to their users creating content. Facebook users post photos and messages meant for friends and families' reaction, Twitter users microblog almost instantaneously about their daily activities, Instagrammers post photos and videos of themselves soliciting likes & the LinkedIn audience seek information for the next job and read articles relating to their areas of interests. While Facebook used to be about photos of its users, it has now fast become an ecosystem engaged in far more than photo-sharing: it's an advertisement behemoth targeting its over one billion users; Twitter on the other hand, while highly monetizing its user base, it's come to represent the heartbeat of the Internet, it's a race to tweeting per second worldwide; Instagram has yet become the photography center of the web with a sprawling growth in its celebrity base and LinkedIn is busy being the breach between users and jobs. They each have become relevant, independent of each other by specializing on their core strengths.
     It's worthy of mention that these sites have all attracted and continue to impact the online cyberspace and many users have presence on all four sites. Perhaps what's even more interesting is that albeit being interactive platforms with users dictating what's hot and what not and hence more similarity between them, logging in the apps of each site give users a different feel. I however seem to be of the opinion that some are more addicting than others: Facebook, Twitter, Instagram are more sticky than LinkedIn. And yet, LinkedIn could be just as sticky when one is in the job market searching for employment.
     Each user might have a different feel for how they interact on each site and hence how they interpret the sites. In the end, they're all social media and networking sites born out of different use, need and utility and users choice to leverage each may be around for some time.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Blog: Next New

     If a ginie would grant me a wish, I would want it to grant me a new media social networking meant specifically for teens, 13-19 years of age. This will cater solely to this segment of the online social networking community. Teens get into so much trouble with Social Media often without knowing it at all. And most often than not the problem is in the language of their messages.      Akin to Snapchat's disappearing photos sent between and among friends, except this will have the consolidated capability to delete messages after it's read by friends.      Allowing friends and friends of friends read messages sent to each other, this messaging feature will ensure teens' typical  reckless, dangerous and life-haunting comments are tamed and put to extinction with immediacy after being read. This distinguishing feature will put many teens out of trouble which currently seems to haunt many affecting job and career prospects, and general ...

Blog Social Networking

Blog Social Networking Blog Social Networking is a hot commodity in the social media age. It's being used by professional There are social networking sites to suit most audience - professional or otherwise. They're geared towards bringing home things of interest to each audience type - for example, think Facebook or LinkedIn. There are many uses of this technology including niche areas of interest to a certain audience. This allows the interaction among allowing users to socialize and learn about in an common environment of mutual interest. This is useful since users can "connect," form "circles," and on social networking sites, people get jobs! Other uses would include collaboration, creativity and great marketing awareness for a certain item, product or concept. These users get exposure and enjoy specific content and feel "in the know" that others may not therefore creating that "good feel' factor. Blog Social Networking is not i...

BLOG: Blog v Wiki

Blogs or wikis is the question. While both are interactive and incorporate "community," amongst users, blogs stem from a more centralized place of creation whereas a wiki is more decentralized. This suggests that Wikis are more susceptible to "wrong information" due to its decentralized nature that allows anyone, educated, experienced or not to have a say in a specified topic. A blog comes from an author who has somewhat a more reliable amount of information on a given topic. The reality is that both are crucial in today's modern-day and age. Wikis are more appropriate in some instances while blogs are advisable over wikis in other circumstances. For example, for a politician running a campaign, a wiki that allows voters to say and voice their opinion can be pretty helpful to tap into helping with the "grassroots" mobilization (as mentioned in the article about grassroots mobilization). The sample politician may prefer a blog in setting the tone for ...